Thursday, March 8, 2012

M. Müller & Sohn Review: The perfect sleeve

Hello everyone, I'm back with my third and so far last part of the M. Müller & Sohn pattern drafting review. As with both my other reviews on how Müller & Sohn address ease and special figures, this one is also based on their book on drafting dresses and blouses and is entirely devoted to their genius way of drafting sleeves.

Before I get into Müller & Sohn's sleeve draft, let's have a look at one typical way in which sleeves are drafted. Below you can see a sleeve draft according to Modern Pattern Design from 1942 by Harriet Pepin. This draft is fairly similar to more modern sleeve drafting resources like, for example, Helen Joseph Armstrong's Patternmaking for Fashion Design. The sleeve cap is fairy flat and the length on either side of the shoulder line is the same. The slope and length of the cap is also not dramatically different on the back or front of the sleeve.

Source: Harriet Pepin's Modern Pattern Design (1942)

This type of sleeve draft suggests that our arms hang symmetrically from our shoulders, having the same slope from the shoulder point to underarm seam on both the front and back of the armhole. Below I've borrowed a picture from the Japanese Digital Human Resource Center, showing a new and more anatomically correct dress form to the left and a traditional not so anatomically correct dress form to the right.

Source: Digital Human Resource Center

I have drawn in a red line to suggest the hang of the sleeve perpendicular to the floor from the shoulder point. As you can see the not so anatomically correct form suggests that the sleeve cap is fairly the same length and shape on the back and front, whereas the more anatomically correct form shows that the sleeve caps are quite different in shape and length on the back and front. The less anatomically correct form pairs up nicely with the sleeve draft found in Harriet Pepin, whereas the more anatomically correct sleeve cap shape - i.e. as on an actual body - is much better addressed by the sleeve draft you can see below.


This is my own draft of a sleeve according to M. Müller & Sohn and shows how the hang of the sleeve from the shoulder is not centered. The back cap (on the right) is much longer and has a different shape from the front cap, much like a real arm and shoulder. Before I drafted my own sleeve according to M. Müller & Sohn I couldn't quite believe that this type of sleeve would actually allow for a greater range of motion for the arm but it really does. The difference is quite severe and I now find it hard to go back to the other type of sleeve found in many home-sewing patterns.

If you are a follower of Fashion Incubator I'm sure that you have read about this sleeve drafting issue before. This is how I heard about the different sleeve drafts first and started to become more interested in the German method of drafting. For a much better and more professional and informed explanation of different sleeve drafts and sleeve ease, here are some of the posts on Fashion Incubator which relate to this topic: the ever so popular Sleeve cap ease is bogus, a review of Patternmaking in Fashion by Lucia Mors de Castro, and an entry on Japanese dress forms. There are many more entries on Fashion Incubator that relate to this  topic but I can't locate them all.

Again, if you would like to draft a German-style sleeve but don't speak any German at all, Lucia Mors de Castro's book Patternmaking for Fashion, which I suggested in a previous post will show you how to draft this type of sleeve in English.

I'm planning on reviewing a couple more pattern resources in future posts. I really like writing these kinds of posts. Müller & Sohn's book, although being pretty comprehensive and very, very good, is not the be all and end all of pattern drafting books. There is so much more out there.

Hope you enjoyed this review and found it useful. Happy drafting everyone!

9 comments:

  1. Hi Stephanie,
    Can you believe it, I'm currently in the process of drafting a sleeve pattern, and have done my own research on the subject (in fact, I'm writing a similar post on my blog, too). I came to the same conclusion myself - the sleeve head needs to be significantly asymmetrical in order to fit properly and allow for the hands to move in a wide range. Unfortunately, my pattern drafting class doesn't cover these issues as detailed as I'd like it to. So, I need to figure out my own way to make a perfect sleeve. Your pictures and post help a lot!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Stephanie,

    I have been following your reviews of this system with great interest! I am a bit of a drafting geek myself and would love to give this a go - unfortunately, being in Australia makes the book+shipping quite expensive. Your reviews make deciding to order a copy much easier! I can't wait to get my hands on the coat book in particular. Sounds like it is worth it!

    -Enken

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Stephanie,
    Is this sleeve draft applicable for dresses/blouse in general? For some reason, I am under the impression that this sleeve draft is more for jackets/coats. If this is indeed applicable for dresses/blouse, then is setting-in method the only way to sew it to the armhole? Basic questions because I am a beginner :).

    My source book (Hofenbitzer's 'Bekleidung') offers three drafts for sleeve, one for knits, one for 'regular' sleeve with a shorter cap, and one for jacket/coat like yours above. So I haven't really ventured into the above draft eventhough "Bekleidung" has a tutorial.

    On another note, I think I may have figured out what went wrong my recent sloper's sleeve/arm, which I wrote about in your previous post.... I put in the wrong ease number into the armdurchmesser, armlochtiefe, and brustbreite. I couldn't believe I committed such a basic mistake :). Back to square 1.... :D

    Katzies
    still saving to buy M&S book!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello,

      yes, this sleeve can be used for all fitted dresses, blouses, jackets, coats, etc. In Hofenbitzer's book, this type of sleeve is also used for dresses and blouses. The one with the shorter, wider cap is for more loosely fitted clothes.

      Stephanie

      Delete
  4. PS: I have to agree that Lucia Mors's direction to draft a sleeve is worth buying "Patternmaking in Practice." I made a sloper using the book, and the sleeve hung really nicely!

    Katzies

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great post! I really wish I was more of a geek, but there's so much that takes up my time in the spare time, so I hardly find time to concentrate on anything. Bohoo! Then it's nice to use you as a reference! The idea of the New Dressmaking Dummy is super interesting, and I wonder if there's pattern cutting books with these things taken into account?

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is really interesting, I haven't drafted anything from scratch exept for some hats so far. Usually I just take a simple Burda pattern and work from there. I have a pretty good fitting blouse bodice so I wonder, do you think there is a way I could change the sleeve so it resembles this one but still fits into my bodice? Or is the armhole formed different too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hallo,

      Nein, das Armloch ist, soweit ich erkennen kann, nicht anders geformt. Man könnte, nehme ich an, auch einen nicht nach M&S gezeichneten Oberteilgrundschnitt nehmen und diesen Typ Ärmel dazuzeichnen. Wie man nun aber einen Ärmel abändert, um ihn wie einen M&S Ärmel aussehen zu lassen, kann ich dir leider nicth sagen. da würd ich eher einen neuen Ärmel nach dieser Methode zeichnen. Viel Glück!

      Stephanie

      Delete
    2. Danke, ich werde versuchen das Buch in der Bücherhalle zu finden. Ich weiß auch nicht inwieweit die Burdaärmel dieser Methode schon entsprechen, ich habe "Mein ganz persönliches Schnittmuster" von Lee Hollahan und die Grundschnitte sind im Grunde vorne und hinten identisch wohingegen die Burdaschnitte zumindest die Form andeuten die Müller und Sohn verwenden. Ich werde mal versuchen das rauszufinden...

      Nora

      Delete

Feel free to leave a comment! (Please do not comment anonymously. You do not need an ID, but please leave a name. Thank you!)